Skip to content
effecthub

Llama vs Qwen

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Both are free to use
Public API
Both have one
Best fit
Llama: Self-hosting a capable model on your own hardware · Qwen: Anyone wanting a free chatbot with no message cap
Platforms
Llama: Web · Qwen: Web, iOS, Android
Trust score
About even — Llama 91, Qwen 90

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactLlamaQwen
CategoryOpen-source Models & HubsGeneral-purpose AI Chatbots
Pricing modelFreeFree
Public APIYesYes
Trust score91 / 10090 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, iOS, Android, API
CompanyMeta Platforms, Inc.Alibaba Cloud
Launched20232023
Last verifiedOct 22, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Llama

Still the default choice when you need weights you can hold, fine-tune and run offline, with an ecosystem of quantisations and inference stacks built around it. The licence is not OSI-open, and Meta's web presence keeps moving: llama.com now forwards wholesale to the developer site, where Llama is listed next to the newer Muse family, so links rot faster than the models do and the roadmap looks less Llama-first than it did.

Pros

  • Weights are downloadable, not just API-accessible
  • Broad tooling support: llama.cpp, vLLM, Hugging Face and most inference runtimes
  • Multiple sizes so you can trade quality against a single GPU
  • Commercial use permitted for almost everyone under the MAU threshold

Cons

  • Community licence is not open source; attribution, the Llama name prefix and the MAU cap all bind
  • Meta keeps moving the site: llama.com and llama.meta.com now forward to dev.meta.ai, where Llama shares the menu with the Muse models
  • Running it is your cost and your operational problem
  • Meta's Model API shows no public price; it is login or contact sales

Qwen

Qwen is a solid free daily-driver chatbot backed by a large, frequently updated model family, and the same models are available to self-host since several sizes ship open-weight. The chat product's polish trails ChatGPT or Gemini in the English-speaking market, and account creation nudges toward a phone number or Alibaba-linked login.

Pros

  • Free consumer chat and mobile apps with no visible message limit
  • Open-weight model releases available for self-hosting, not just API access
  • Multimodal chat handles file uploads and image generation in the same thread
  • Per-token API pricing is inexpensive next to comparable Western models

Cons

  • English-language polish and plugin ecosystem lag the top US chat products
  • Signing up leans on a phone number or Alibaba account

Which one fits

Choose Llama if you need

  • Self-hosting a capable model on your own hardware
  • Fine-tuning on private data that cannot leave your network
  • Teams wanting an exit from per-token API pricing

Choose Qwen if you need

  • Anyone wanting a free chatbot with no message cap
  • Developers who want to self-host an open-weight model instead of only calling an API
  • Users comfortable with a Chinese-company-operated service

Llama vs Qwen: the questions people ask

Does Llama or Qwen have a free tier?

Both: Llama is free to use, and Qwen is free to use.

Which has a public API, Llama or Qwen?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

All Llama alternatives →All Qwen alternatives →Browse all Open-source Models & Hubs →