Skip to content
effecthub

Langflow vs Sim

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Both — Langflow is free to use, Sim has a free plan
Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Sim — 96 vs 83 for Langflow
Best fit
Langflow: teams prototyping RAG and agent flows visually before coding them · Sim: Teams that want a visual agent builder they can also self-host
Platforms
Langflow: Web, macOS, Windows, Linux · Sim: Web

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactLangflowSim
CategoryLLM Orchestration FrameworksAgent Frameworks & Orchestration
Pricing modelFreeFreemium
Starts at—$25/seat/mo
Public APIYesYes
Trust score83 / 10096 / 100
PlatformsWeb, macOS, Windows, Linux, APIWeb, API
CompanyLangflowSim Studio, Inc.
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Langflow

Langflow is the visual layer most teams reach for when a flow needs to be shown to someone who does not write Python, and the escape hatch into real code keeps it from becoming a toy. Deploying a flow as an API or MCP server in one step is the feature that earns it a place in production. The gap is commercial: no published pricing, no named vendor on the site, and support only via a contact form.

Pros

  • MIT-licensed with roughly 154,000 GitHub stars and an active release cadence
  • Any flow deploys as an HTTP API or an MCP server
  • Runs identically self-hosted, in the free cloud, or as a desktop app
  • Components can be edited as Python when the visual layer runs out

Cons

  • No pricing or support tiers published anywhere on the site
  • Desktop download requires a signup form and covers only Mac and Windows
  • The site names no operating company or jurisdiction
  • Visual flows get hard to reason about once they grow past a screen

Sim

Sim covers the unglamorous half of agent work — memory, tables, file storage, logs — in the same place you draw the workflow, and the open repository means you can host it yourself if the meter bothers you. The meter is the catch: credits are the unit of everything, and an agent that loops or fans out consumes them faster than the per-seat headline suggests.

Pros

  • Three ways to build the same agent: visual canvas, chat, or code
  • Ships knowledge bases, data tables and file storage alongside the workflow engine
  • Open source on GitHub with a documented self-hosting route
  • Free plan with 1,000 starter credits, one workspace and 5 GB of storage

Cons

  • Every plan is metered in credits, so cost tracks usage rather than headcount
  • The free allowance is one-time, not monthly, so ongoing use means a paid seat
  • Concurrency is capped per plan — 10 simultaneous executions on Free, 50 on Pro
  • SSO, access control and SOC2 paperwork sit behind the quoted Enterprise tier

Which one fits

Choose Langflow if you need

  • teams prototyping RAG and agent flows visually before coding them
  • self-hosters who want an MIT-licensed orchestration layer
  • exposing a flow to other tools as an MCP server

Choose Sim if you need

  • Teams that want a visual agent builder they can also self-host
  • Connecting agents to many SaaS tools without writing the glue code
  • Prototyping an agent and keeping the traces to debug it afterwards

Langflow vs Sim: the questions people ask

Is Langflow cheaper than Sim?

Langflow is free to use; Sim starts at $25/seat/mo.

Does Langflow or Sim have a free tier?

Both: Langflow is free to use, and Sim has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Langflow or Sim?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

All Sim alternatives →Browse all LLM Orchestration Frameworks →

From the blog