Skip to content
effecthub

Kickresume vs LumaResume

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Kickresume — 83 vs 62 for LumaResume
Best fit
Kickresume: Candidates who want a clean, well-typeset resume without fighting a word processor · LumaResume: Active job seekers applying to many similar roles
Platforms
Kickresume: Web · LumaResume: Web, Chrome extension
Status
Both up at our last check (Oct 15, 2026)

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactKickresumeLumaResume
CategoryJob Search & ApplicationsResume & Cover Letters
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at—$19.99/mo
Trust score83 / 10062 / 100
PlatformsWebWeb, Chrome extension
CompanyKickresume—
Launched2013—
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Kickresume

A good-looking resume builder whose free tier is a template gallery and nothing more — the writer, the cover letter tool, the ATS checker and the career map are all paid. Buy it for one month while you are actively applying and cancel; the annual plan only pays off for a job hunt measured in quarters.

Pros

  • Free downloads are genuinely unlimited, which several competitors gate
  • The output covers resume, cover letter and a hosted page from one set of content
  • A long-established company rather than a recent launch, founded 2013 in Bratislava
  • The ATS checker addresses the specific failure mode that sinks well-written resumes

Cons

  • Every generative feature is paid, so the free tier cannot demonstrate the product's premise
  • Month-to-month at EUR 24 costs three times the yearly rate of EUR 8/month
  • Pricing is euro-only with no USD figures shown, making the true cost currency-dependent
  • Four free templates against 40-plus paid ones makes the free gallery a shop window

LumaResume

LumaResume is useful if you already have a solid resume and want it reshaped per job posting rather than built from scratch — the match score and browser extension make that workflow quick. Three free tailorings a month is enough to try it, but frequent job hunters will hit the cap fast and need the $19.99 Pro plan.

Pros

  • Chrome extension works on LinkedIn, Indeed, Glassdoor, Greenhouse, Lever, and Workday
  • Generates a match score against the job description
  • Includes cover letter generation
  • Free tier has no time limit, just a monthly cap

Cons

  • Free plan caps out at 3 tailorings and 3 cover letters a month
  • DOCX export requires the paid plan
  • No published company or team information

Which one fits

Choose Kickresume if you need

  • Candidates who want a clean, well-typeset resume without fighting a word processor
  • Applicants wanting the same content as a resume, a cover letter and a personal page
  • Anyone in an active search who will use the paid features within a single month

Choose LumaResume if you need

  • Active job seekers applying to many similar roles
  • People who want a fit score against a specific job post
  • Users who apply directly from LinkedIn or Indeed

Kickresume vs LumaResume: the questions people ask

Is Kickresume cheaper than LumaResume?

LumaResume starts at $19.99/mo. Kickresume has a free tier; what its paid plans cost is not confirmed by us yet.

Does Kickresume or LumaResume have a free tier?

Both: Kickresume has a free tier, and LumaResume has a free tier.

Browse all Job Search & Applications →