Skip to content
effecthub

Helicone vs Portkey

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Portkey — $49/mo vs $79/mo for Helicone
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Portkey — 92 vs 80 for Helicone
Best fit
Helicone: Developers who want cost, latency and usage logs for LLM calls with minimal code changes · Portkey: Teams calling several LLM providers who want a single API with fallbacks and caching

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactHeliconePortkey
CategoryLLM Observability & EvaluationAI Gateways & Routing
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$79/mo$49/mo
Public APIYesYes
Trust score80 / 10092 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, API
CompanyHelicone, Inc.Palo Alto Networks
Launched20232023
Last verifiedOct 29, 2026Oct 2, 2026

What our research says

Helicone

Helicone is a quick way to get request logs, cost tracking and caching on top of LLM calls with a one-line base-URL change, and the open-source code means you can run it yourself. Its ownership has changed twice in 2026 and the public changelog has been quiet since late 2025, so teams choosing a long-term observability platform should weigh that against more actively developed options.

Pros

  • Proxy or gateway integration takes one line of configuration
  • Free tier with 10,000 requests a month and an open-source self-host option
  • Built-in caching, rate limits and automatic provider fallbacks
  • Session view for multi-step agent traces and HQL for custom queries

Cons

  • Free plan keeps data for only 7 days and Pro for one month
  • Usage-based charges on top of the plan fee make bills harder to predict
  • Ownership uncertainty: acquired by Mintlify in March 2026, then announced as separated again with no details

Portkey

Portkey is a mature way to put one gateway in front of many model providers, with failover, caching and logging included. It suits teams running LLM apps in production that want cost and reliability controls without writing them. The acquisition by a security vendor is likely to steer the roadmap toward enterprise governance, so small teams should watch pricing and packaging.

Pros

  • Open-source MIT-licensed gateway that can be self-hosted
  • Routing, fallbacks, load balancing and semantic caching in one place
  • Free developer tier and a $49 production tier with published overage pricing
  • Observability, guardrails and prompt management on the same platform

Cons

  • The free tier is limited to 10,000 logs and is not meant for production
  • Brand and packaging are shifting under Palo Alto Networks' Prisma AIRS
  • Advanced governance, SSO and VPC hosting need the Enterprise plan

Which one fits

Choose Helicone if you need

  • Developers who want cost, latency and usage logs for LLM calls with minimal code changes
  • Teams that need a gateway with caching and provider fallback alongside logging
  • Companies that prefer an Apache-2.0 tool they can self-host

Choose Portkey if you need

  • Teams calling several LLM providers who want a single API with fallbacks and caching
  • Platform teams that need guardrails, logs and access control around model usage

Helicone vs Portkey: the questions people ask

Is Helicone cheaper than Portkey?

On published entry prices, Portkey starts lower — $49/mo against $79/mo for Helicone. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Helicone or Portkey have a free tier?

Both: Helicone has a free tier, and Portkey has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Helicone or Portkey?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

All Portkey alternatives →Browse all LLM Observability & Evaluation →