Skip to content
effecthub
Verified Oct 15, 2026

Gandr

Verified Oct 15, 2026 Active
Use tool
Share

Text-to-speech and voice-cloning API billed by concurrent stream instead of by character or minute.

text to speechvoice cloningvoice agentsreal time audioapiFreemium · from $10/mo

Listed on EffectHub ·

InputsTTextAudioOutputsAudioWeb · API
Screenshot of the Gandr website
#1398
gandr.ai as we captured it — our own screenshot, not the vendor’s press image.

Pricing

Pricing model
Freemium
Paid options from
$10/mo
Billing
Monthly

Free tier starts with 50,000 tokens (one token is one character). Take a Gandr is $10/month for 1M tokens, Pro $50/month for 5M; the unmetered Scale stream is $150/month billed annually ($1,800) or $180 month-to-month, extra streams $150 each, burst $10 per stream-day; Enterprise from 500 lines is quoted.

Use tool ↗
Overview

About Gandr

Gandr is a developer-facing text-to-speech and voice-cloning API for live uses such as phone agents, narration and dubbing rather than one-off audio exports. It speaks 23 languages, clones a voice from roughly ten seconds of reference audio with no training job or per-voice fee, and quotes 116 ms server-side and 146 ms over-the-internet time to first audio. Agents connect over WebSocket, batch jobs over HTTP, and it plugs into LiveKit, Pipecat and Vapi. Small plans meter tokens, where one token is one character; the Scale plan instead sells an unmetered concurrent stream at a flat monthly rate, with extra streams and burst capacity priced per stream. It states SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA-verified and GDPR-ready infrastructure, says nothing sent is used for training, and watermarks output inaudibly. It is backed by Y Combinator, but no legal entity or address appears on the site.

Platforms
Web · API
API
Yes
Last verified
Oct 15, 2026

Verified sources

  • Pricing page: Free 50,000 tokens; Take a Gandr $10/mo for 1M tokens; Pro $50/mo for 5M; Scale one unmetered stream at $150/mo on annual ($1,800 billed yearly) or $180 month to month; volume streams $150 each, burst $10 per stream-day; Enterprise from 500 lines (15 October 2026)gandr.ai ↗
  • Homepage: TTS in 23 languages, ten-second voice cloning with no training job, 116 ms p50 server-side and 146 ms internet time to first audio, LiveKit, Pipecat and Vapi integrations, SOC 2 Type 2 / HIPAA / GDPR infrastructure claims, Y Combinator backing; footer has no legal entity or address (15 October 2026)gandr.ai ↗
  • Terms of service, last updated 5 August 2026, state that no company name, registered address or place of incorporation appears on the site and that governing law is 'not chosen anywhere' (15 October 2026)gandr.ai ↗
Fact check

Is Gandr legit?

We don’t label tools safe or unsafe. Below are the records we checked ourselves, each with the date we read it.

Domain registered
Feb 4, 2026Registry record (RDAP), registrar Porkbun LLC, looked up Sep 11, 2026
TLS certificate
Issued by Google Trust Services, valid until Nov 28, 2026Seen in our own connection to the site on Oct 15, 2026
Last checked
Oct 15, 2026The site answered
Operated by
GandrOur research, card verified Oct 15, 2026

How we collect these records

Editorial verdict

Pros & cons of Gandr

medium confidence

Gandr's stream-based pricing is the notable design choice here: instead of metering every character or minute, it charges for reserved concurrent capacity, which favors applications with heavy, unpredictable usage on a fixed number of simultaneous calls, like a phone-based voice agent. That same model works against low-volume or bursty use cases, where a per-character competitor could end up cheaper.

Pros

  • Voice cloning needs only about ten seconds of reference audio with no separate training step
  • 146ms first-audio-byte latency is fast enough for live conversational use
  • Stream-based pricing gives predictable cost regardless of how heavily a stream is used
  • Direct integration with common voice-agent frameworks such as LiveKit, Pipecat, and Vapi

Cons

  • Stream-based billing can cost more than usage-based competitors for light or unpredictable workloads
  • It is API-first infrastructure rather than a consumer app, so it requires development work to use
  • The published terms of service still contain unfilled placeholders: no legal entity, address or governing law is named

Best for

  • Voice-agent builders needing predictable per-stream cost regardless of usage volume
  • Applications requiring low end-to-end audio latency
  • Teams already using LiveKit, Pipecat, or Vapi for voice infrastructure

Not for

  • Low-volume or occasional text-to-speech use, where per-character pricing from a competitor may cost less
  • Teams wanting a no-code consumer app rather than an API

Watch out: The terms page (dated 5 August 2026) literally says no company name, registered address or place of incorporation appears on the site and that governing law has not been chosen; a compliance review for a HIPAA or GDPR workload will stall on that until Gandr names a counterparty.

Gandr head-to-head

Side-by-side fact sheets against the competitors our research or their makers name — pricing, platforms, API and both verdicts on one page.

Tasks

Also used for

Professions

AI tools by profession

Text-to-Speech is one of the jobs on these pages:

Be the first to review Gandr

Ask a question about Gandr