Skip to content
effecthub

Eve Legal vs Supio

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

Eve LegalCase platform for plaintiff firms: intake scoring, medical-record chronologies and drafted demands.SupioAgentic AI platform that builds medical chronologies, demand letters, and case documents for plaintiff injury law firms.

Side by side

FactEve LegalSupio
CategoryLegal & LegalTechLegal & LegalTech
Pricing modelContactContact
Public APINoNo
PlatformsWebWeb
CompanyEve LegalSupio
Launched20232021
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 1, 2026

What our research says

Eve Legal

Eve is the best-funded of the plaintiff-side case platforms, with a $103M Series B and a customer count in the thousands. The narrow focus is a genuine advantage: intake scoring, medical chronologies and demand drafting are exactly where plaintiff firms lose hours. But it is enterprise software with no published price, and its headline metrics - 2.5x case capacity, 30% higher settlements - are the vendor's own numbers.

Pros

  • Turns medical records into case chronologies rather than just summarising documents
  • 24/7 intake with automatic lead scoring, not just an after-hours form
  • Drafts demands, motions and discovery responses inside the same platform
  • Runs alongside an existing case-management system or standalone
  • Deeply funded with a $103M Series B and reported 1,200+ firm customers

Cons

  • No published pricing at all - every path is a sales conversation
  • Practice-area lock: useless outside plaintiff-side work
  • Headline outcome numbers are vendor-reported with no methodology shown
  • No documented public API for firms that want to build against it

Supio

Supio is a well-funded, focused bet on one legal niche, plaintiff personal-injury and mass-tort work, rather than a general legal AI tool, and its $60M Series B and compliance certifications suggest real enterprise traction. It is built for firms, not solo practitioners doing occasional casework, and there is no pricing to compare without booking a demo.

Pros

  • Automates medical chronology creation from raw medical records
  • Generates demand letters and litigation-ready documents
  • SOC 2 Type II certified with stated HIPAA, PHIPA, and GDPR compliance
  • Backed by a $60M Series B and founded by former Microsoft engineers

Cons

  • No self-serve pricing; every purchase path runs through a demo request
  • Narrow focus on personal-injury/mass-tort limits use in other practice areas
  • Enterprise sales motion likely means a longer buying cycle for smaller firms

Which one fits

Choose Eve Legal if you need

  • Plaintiff-side personal injury and med-mal firms
  • Firms drowning in medical record review
  • Practices that want intake triaged and scored around the clock

Choose Supio if you need

  • Plaintiff personal-injury and mass-tort law firms
  • Firms wanting to automate medical chronologies and demand letters
  • Practices already using Westlaw or similar case-management tools

Browse all Legal & LegalTech →