Skip to content
effecthub

Consensus vs StoryCraft

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. StoryCraft publishes a starting price ($79); Consensus does not. Only Consensus has a free tier.

ConsensusSearch over peer-reviewed papers with claim summariesStoryCraftResearch briefs for documentary filmmakers with sourced timelines and per-source credibility scores

Side by side

FactConsensusStoryCraft
CategoryAcademic Search & Literature ReviewDeep Research Agents
Pricing modelFreemiumPaid
Starts at—$79 month
Public APINoNo
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb
CompanyConsensusStoryCraft
Launched2021—
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Consensus

Useful when you want to know what a body of literature actually concludes rather than reading one paper at a time, but it orients you, it does not replace reading them.

Pros

  • Every answer is tied to specific papers with study design and sample size
  • Free tier is a standing plan rather than a time-limited trial
  • The yes-or-no consensus meter is a fast orientation device
  • Covers a very large index of peer-reviewed literature

Cons

  • Summaries can flatten real disagreement between studies into false consensus
  • Coverage skews to indexed English-language biomedical work
  • Pricing cannot be verified from outside; the site blocks automated access
  • Free allowance of the deeper analyses runs out quickly in real use

StoryCraft

Aimed at a real gap: independent documentary teams doing weeks of scattered verification by hand. The output shape is right, structured timelines with per-source credibility rather than prose, and the defamation scan and FOIA kit show someone who knows the workflow. But it is still closed beta, run by one founder, and three briefs a month at $79 works out around $26 each.

Pros

  • Output is structured research: timeline, sources and credibility scores, not prose
  • Defamation risk scan and FOIA kit target real documentary production problems
  • Exports to PDF and Markdown and stays searchable across past briefs
  • Prices are published rather than hidden behind a sales call

Cons

  • Still closed beta with a waitlist, so access is not guaranteed on signup
  • Only three briefs a month at the entry price, roughly $26 per brief
  • Single-founder operation with no company registration details published
  • Credibility scores are generated, not audited, and still need a human pass before broadcast

Which one fits

Choose Consensus if you need

  • Checking whether a specific claim has support across published studies
  • Clinicians and students orienting quickly in an unfamiliar literature
  • Anyone who wants citations attached to every summarised claim

Choose StoryCraft if you need

  • independent documentary producers scoping a subject
  • investigative teams that need a sourced timeline fast
  • researchers who want exportable briefs rather than chat transcripts

More comparisons

All Consensus alternatives →Browse all Academic Search & Literature Review →