Skip to content
effecthub

Consensus vs Seaml.es

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Consensus has one; not confirmed by us for Seaml.es
Higher Trust score
Consensus — 90 vs 75 for Seaml.es
Best fit
Consensus: Checking whether a specific claim has support across published studies · Seaml.es: Quickly drafting a starting-point literature review before manual refinement
Platforms
Consensus: Web, iOS, Android · Seaml.es: Web

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactConsensusSeaml.es
CategoryAcademic Search & Literature ReviewAcademic Search & Literature Review
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at—$9.99/credit
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score90 / 10075 / 100
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, APIWeb
CompanyConsensus NLP, Inc.Seaml.es
Launched2021—
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Consensus

Useful when you want to know what a body of literature actually concludes rather than reading one paper at a time, but it orients you, it does not replace reading them.

Pros

  • Every answer is tied to specific papers with study design and sample size
  • Free tier is a standing plan rather than a time-limited trial
  • The yes-or-no consensus meter is a fast orientation device
  • Covers a very large index of peer-reviewed literature

Cons

  • Summaries can flatten real disagreement between studies into false consensus
  • Coverage skews to indexed English-language biomedical work
  • Pricing cannot be verified from outside; the site blocks automated access
  • Free allowance of the deeper analyses runs out quickly in real use

Seaml.es

Seaml.es is narrower than a general research assistant, specifically drafting a literature review from a description of a topic, sourced from Semantic Scholar's index, rather than trying to be a full paper-writing workspace. The 20-query daily cap applies even on the unlimited-credit monthly plan, which is an odd limit to keep on a subscription marketed as unlimited.

Pros

  • Draws directly from the Semantic Scholar academic database rather than general web search
  • Produces citations and formatting aimed at academic standards
  • A pay-as-you-go option exists for occasional use instead of forcing a subscription
  • Also covers scholarship search and application essay guidance in the same account

Cons

  • A 20-query/24-hour cap applies even to the unlimited monthly and yearly plans
  • The homepage itself returned no readable content to an automated fetch, so some details rely on a secondary page and third-party summaries

Which one fits

Choose Consensus if you need

  • Checking whether a specific claim has support across published studies
  • Clinicians and students orienting quickly in an unfamiliar literature
  • Anyone who wants citations attached to every summarised claim

Choose Seaml.es if you need

  • Quickly drafting a starting-point literature review before manual refinement
  • Students also wanting scholarship-application essay help in the same account
  • Researchers wanting citations sourced specifically from Semantic Scholar's index

Consensus vs Seaml.es: the questions people ask

Is Consensus cheaper than Seaml.es?

Seaml.es starts at $9.99/credit. Consensus has a free tier; what its paid plans cost is not confirmed by us yet.

Does Consensus or Seaml.es have a free tier?

Both: Consensus has a free tier, and Seaml.es has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Consensus or Seaml.es?

Consensus ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Seaml.es is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All Consensus alternatives →All Seaml.es alternatives →Browse all Academic Search & Literature Review →