Skip to content
effecthub

Consensus vs Paperguide

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. Paperguide publishes a starting price ($29); Consensus does not. Both have a free tier.

ConsensusSearch over peer-reviewed papers with claim summariesPaperguideLiterature search, reference manager, extraction tables and systematic review with PRISMA screening in one tool.

Side by side

FactConsensusPaperguide
CategoryAcademic Search & Literature ReviewAcademic Search & Literature Review
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at—$29 month
Public APINoNo
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb, Chrome Ext
CompanyConsensusPaperguide
Launched2021—
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Consensus

Useful when you want to know what a body of literature actually concludes rather than reading one paper at a time, but it orients you, it does not replace reading them.

Pros

  • Every answer is tied to specific papers with study design and sample size
  • Free tier is a standing plan rather than a time-limited trial
  • The yes-or-no consensus meter is a fast orientation device
  • Covers a very large index of peer-reviewed literature

Cons

  • Summaries can flatten real disagreement between studies into false consensus
  • Coverage skews to indexed English-language biomedical work
  • Pricing cannot be verified from outside; the site blocks automated access
  • Free allowance of the deeper analyses runs out quickly in real use

Paperguide

Unusually complete for this category: most tools do search or reference management or extraction, and Paperguide does all three plus PRISMA-grade systematic review screening. That breadth is worth the $29 if you actually run reviews. Credits meter everything, and some headline features are still labelled as coming.

Pros

  • Search across a stated 200M papers with citation-grounded answers
  • Imports existing libraries from Zotero, Mendeley or DOI
  • Data extraction into structured, cited tables rather than free text
  • Systematic review module with PRISMA reporting
  • Free tier of 1,000 credits a month to evaluate properly

Cons

  • Image and table extraction and dual-reviewer screening are still marked as coming soon
  • Everything is metered in AI credits, so heavy review work hits limits
  • Advertised low prices assume annual billing; month-to-month is roughly 70% more
  • No named legal entity — the terms only give a Georgia, US jurisdiction

Which one fits

Choose Consensus if you need

  • Checking whether a specific claim has support across published studies
  • Clinicians and students orienting quickly in an unfamiliar literature
  • Anyone who wants citations attached to every summarised claim

Choose Paperguide if you need

  • researchers running systematic or scoping reviews
  • teams that want search, references and extraction in one tool
  • anyone migrating a Zotero or Mendeley library into an AI workflow

More comparisons

All Consensus alternatives →All Paperguide alternatives →Browse all Academic Search & Literature Review →