Skip to content
effecthub

Canyon vs Huntr

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Canyon — $16.33/mo vs $40/mo for Huntr
Free plan
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Huntr — 92 vs 86 for Canyon
Best fit
Canyon: US candidates running many applications at once · Huntr: Anyone running dozens of applications at once who has outgrown a spreadsheet
Status
Both up at our last check — Canyon Oct 22, 2026, Huntr Oct 15, 2026

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactCanyonHuntr
CategoryJob Search & ApplicationsJob Search & Applications
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$16.33/mo$40/mo
Trust score86 / 10092 / 100
PlatformsWeb, Chrome extensionWeb, Chrome extension
CompanyCanyonHuntr
Launched—2016
Last verifiedOct 22, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Canyon

The value is the tracker plus the extension: saving a posting and autofilling the form is where a job hunt actually leaks time, and Canyon covers it alongside the resume work. The listing database is US-only, and the useful research features sit on the $43 tier rather than the $16 one.

Pros

  • Chrome extension saves postings and autofills applications on major boards
  • Resume scoring and per-posting tailoring against ATS parsing
  • Application tracker with analytics rather than a separate spreadsheet
  • Free tier covers resumes, cover letters and mock interviews at reduced limits
  • Student discount available with a .edu address

Cons

  • Listings database is US-only, roughly 600,000 postings
  • Company research and networking features are Gold-only at $43.33/month
  • Advertised prices assume quarterly billing, so month-to-month costs more
  • No mobile app

Huntr

Huntr is the rare job tool that treats a search as a pipeline rather than a series of one-off applications, and the kanban board plus contact and interview trackers are genuinely better than a spreadsheet. Pairing that with per-posting resume tailoring and an autofill extension removes most of the mechanical work. The pricing is aggressive for a product people use for two or three months: $40 a month rolling is steep, and the discount only arrives if you commit before you know how long the search will take.

Pros

  • One-click job capture from the Chrome extension with automatic keyword extraction
  • Kanban pipeline with separate contact, interview and scheduling trackers
  • Resume tailoring against a specific posting with a match score, plus cover-letter generation
  • Autofill works across many common application forms
  • Free tier is genuinely usable for tracking, capped at 100 jobs

Cons

  • $40/month rolling is high for a tool most people need for a short, uncertain period
  • The real discount requires committing three or six months up front
  • Free tier's two tailored resumes run out almost immediately if tailoring is why you came

Which one fits

Choose Canyon if you need

  • US candidates running many applications at once
  • people who need ATS-aware resume tailoring per posting
  • anyone currently tracking applications in a spreadsheet

Choose Huntr if you need

  • Anyone running dozens of applications at once who has outgrown a spreadsheet
  • Tailoring one base resume against each job description and checking keyword match
  • Cutting the repetitive typing out of ATS application forms

Canyon vs Huntr: the questions people ask

Is Canyon cheaper than Huntr?

On published entry prices, Canyon starts lower — $16.33/mo against $40/mo for Huntr. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Canyon or Huntr have a free tier?

Both: Canyon has a free tier, and Huntr has a free tier.

Browse all Job Search & Applications →