Skip to content
effecthub

Bolt.new vs Glaze

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Glaze — $10/mo vs $25/mo for Bolt.new
Free plan
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Glaze — 94 vs 85 for Bolt.new
Best fit
Bolt.new: Founders and designers who want a clickable prototype or landing page the same afternoon · Glaze: Mac users who want a working desktop utility without writing code
Platforms
Bolt.new: Web · Glaze: macOS

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactBolt.newGlaze
CategoryVibe Coding & App GeneratorsVibe Coding & App Generators
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$25/mo$10/mo
Trust score85 / 10094 / 100
PlatformsWebmacOS
CompanyStackBlitz, Inc.Raycast
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 1, 2026

What our research says

Bolt.new

Bolt is the quickest way to get from a sentence to a running web app you can click, and Bolt Cloud now removes the usual 'where does this deploy' problem for small projects. Treat the token meter as the real price: a complex app burns through the entry allowance fast, and the free tier is for trying the product, not shipping from it.

Pros

  • Whole toolchain runs in the browser, so there is no environment to set up or keep alive
  • Starts from a prompt, Figma design, GitHub repo or template, and exports back to GitHub
  • Bolt Cloud bundles hosting, databases and auth, which most prompt-to-app tools leave to you
  • Unused Pro tokens roll over, unlike most rivals' monthly allowances

Cons

  • Token-based pricing is hard to forecast; one long debugging session can eat days of allowance
  • Free tier is throttled daily (300K tokens) and carries Bolt branding
  • Yearly discount is advertised without the actual yearly prices on the page
  • No public API found, so Bolt cannot be driven from a script or CI

Glaze

Glaze lets you describe a Mac app in chat and get a real, locally-running native application instead of a web page, which is what separates it from browser-based AI app builders. It's Mac-only for now, needs Apple Silicon and a recent macOS version, and the free tier's 50 credits are a one-time allowance rather than monthly.

Pros

  • Builds native macOS apps with file-system access and menu-bar integration, not just web pages
  • Apps run offline once built
  • Can use an existing Claude subscription instead of buying Glaze credits
  • Made by Raycast, an established Mac productivity company

Cons

  • Restricted to macOS Tahoe on Apple Silicon; no Windows or Linux support yet
  • Free tier's 50 credits are one-time, not renewing monthly

Which one fits

Choose Bolt.new if you need

  • Founders and designers who want a clickable prototype or landing page the same afternoon
  • Developers scaffolding a front end or internal tool before taking it into their own editor
  • Teams turning a Figma mock into a working front end without hand-coding the first pass

Choose Glaze if you need

  • Mac users who want a working desktop utility without writing code
  • People who already pay for Raycast or a Claude subscription and want to reuse it for building

Bolt.new vs Glaze: the questions people ask

Is Bolt.new cheaper than Glaze?

On published entry prices, Glaze starts lower — $10/mo against $25/mo for Bolt.new. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Bolt.new or Glaze have a free tier?

Both: Bolt.new has a free tier, and Glaze has a free tier.

All Bolt.new alternatives →All Glaze alternatives →Browse all Vibe Coding & App Generators →