Skip to content
effecthub

Arcads vs Waymark

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Neither — Arcads has paid plans only, Waymark has paid plans only
Public API
Arcads has one; not confirmed by us for Waymark
Higher Trust score
Waymark — 94 vs 81 for Arcads
Best fit
Arcads: Performance marketers testing many creative variants of one script · Waymark: Broadcast and cable sales reps producing spec ads to win local advertisers
Status
Both up at our last check (Oct 16, 2026)

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactArcadsWaymark
CategoryAd Creative GenerationAd Creative Generation
Pricing modelPaidPaid
Starts at—$399/mo
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score81 / 10094 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb
CompanyFRESHR SASWaymark
Launched—2017
Last verifiedOct 16, 2026Oct 16, 2026

What our research says

Arcads

For paid-social teams that need forty variants of the same hook, Arcads is built for exactly that: a large licensed actor roster, script-to-video in one pass and localisation baked in. The catch is total pricing opacity — nothing on the public site tells you what a video costs until you have an account, and the API needs a sales call.

Pros

  • Over a thousand AI actors plus custom avatar creation
  • Captions, translation and background handling included in the render
  • Workflow canvas designed around team-based variant testing
  • Vendor identity is disclosed plainly: FRESHR SAS, registered in Rouen, France

Cons

  • No published pricing anywhere on the public site
  • API is locked to a customised plan arranged by phone
  • Terms restrict service to professional clients, so consumers are excluded

Waymark

Built for the people who sell local TV and CTV airtime — broadcasters, agencies and media sales teams who need a spec ad in front of a prospect the same day. For anyone else the entry price is indefensible: $399/month buys two finished downloads.

Pros

  • Website-to-ad branding pull removes most per-advertiser setup
  • Unlimited draft generations, so you can pitch variations before spending a download
  • Output meets TV and digital ad delivery specs, which generic AI video tools do not handle
  • 7-day trial on the self-serve Starter tier

Cons

  • $399/month monthly (or $350 annually) for two finished downloads is a very high effective cost per video
  • Team tier jumps to $1,125/month and is quote-based on volume
  • Translations, variations and the template library are gated behind Team
  • No public API, so it cannot be embedded in your own workflow without an enterprise deal

Which one fits

Choose Arcads if you need

  • Performance marketers testing many creative variants of one script
  • Brands localising the same ad into several languages
  • Agencies that need actor likenesses cleared for commercial ad use

Choose Waymark if you need

  • Broadcast and cable sales reps producing spec ads to win local advertisers
  • Agencies producing high volumes of small-business video creative
  • Media companies offering self-serve ad creation to their own advertisers
  • Work that must land on TV specs rather than 9:16 social cuts

Arcads vs Waymark: the questions people ask

Is Arcads cheaper than Waymark?

Waymark starts at $399/mo. An entry price for Arcads is not confirmed by us yet, so check its pricing page before you compare.

Which has a public API, Arcads or Waymark?

Arcads ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Waymark is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All Arcads alternatives →All Waymark alternatives →Browse all Ad Creative Generation →