Skip to content
effecthub

Ara vs Devin

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Entry price
The same for both — $20/mo
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Devin has one; not confirmed by us for Ara
Higher Trust score
Devin — 84 vs 72 for Ara
Best fit
Ara: Engineering teams that triage work through GitHub issues · Devin: Engineering teams delegating well-specified tickets such as migrations, test coverage and dependency upgrades

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactAraDevin
CategoryAI Coding AssistantsAI Code Editors & IDEs
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$20/mo$20/mo
Public APINot confirmedYes
Trust score72 / 10084 / 100
PlatformsWebWeb, macOS, Slack app, API
CompanyAraCognition AI, Inc.
Last verifiedSep 1, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Ara

Ara acts like an async engineer you assign issues to: it reproduces the bug, writes the fix, and hands back a pull request with evidence instead of just a diff. The evidence bundle of recordings, logs and tests is meant to cut down the review overhead of trusting an agent's output blindly. It fits teams already living in GitHub issues more than someone wanting an in-editor autocomplete replacement.

Pros

  • Attaches screen recordings and logs to every pull request it opens
  • Supports multiple underlying models (Claude, GPT, Grok, Kimi)
  • Runs from browser, desktop, CLI or mobile rather than one client only
  • Team pricing doesn't scale per seat

Cons

  • No public breakdown of what each model actually costs against the monthly balance
  • Free tier is a one-time credit, not an ongoing free plan

Devin

Devin is the agent to hand a whole ticket to and walk away from, and the $20 Pro tier makes that affordable to try for the first time. The quota is the catch: a long autonomous session can exhaust a plan quickly, and once it does you are paying API rates, so it suits teams that batch well-scoped tasks rather than developers who want a tireless pair programmer in the loop.

Pros

  • End-to-end autonomy: plans, codes, tests and opens the pull request from its own cloud machine
  • Fans one large task out across parallel agents and manages them itself
  • Native Slack, Linear, Jira and GitHub integration plus Desktop and CLI clients
  • Entry price dropped to $20 a month, far below the original enterprise-only positioning

Cons

  • Quotas are described only qualitatively ('light', 'generous'), so cost per task is hard to predict
  • Overage is billed at API pricing, which is where a runaway agent session gets expensive
  • Team tier adds a flat $80 a month on top of $40 per full user
  • Pages are heavily client-rendered; the terms live on cognition.com, not devin.ai

Which one fits

Choose Ara if you need

  • Engineering teams that triage work through GitHub issues
  • Teams wanting evidence (recordings, logs) attached to AI-written PRs
  • Companies wanting to scale usage without paying per seat

Choose Devin if you need

  • Engineering teams delegating well-specified tickets such as migrations, test coverage and dependency upgrades
  • Organisations that want agents assigned from Slack, Linear or Jira and reviewed as pull requests
  • Large codebases where a task can be fanned out across parallel cloud agents

Ara vs Devin: the questions people ask

Is Ara cheaper than Devin?

Both publish the same entry price, $20/mo. The difference is what each plan includes, which the fact table above sets side by side.

Does Ara or Devin have a free tier?

Both: Ara has a free tier, and Devin has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Ara or Devin?

Devin ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Ara is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All Ara alternatives →All Devin alternatives →Browse all AI Coding Assistants →