Bolt.new vs Omniflow

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Entry price: The same for both — $25/mo
Free plan: Both have one
Higher Trust score: Bolt.new — 85 vs 78 for Omniflow
Best fit: Bolt.new: Founders and designers who want a clickable prototype or landing page the same afternoon · Omniflow: teams that want a PRD, design preview, and code to stay in sync through several iterations
Status: Both up at our last check — Bolt.new Sep 6, 2026, Omniflow Sep 1, 2026

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Bolt.newIn-browser agent that builds and runs web apps

OmniflowGenerates a PRD, a clickable UI preview, and production Next.js code from a spec, keeping all three in sync.

Side by side

Fact	Bolt.new	Omniflow
Category	Vibe Coding & App Generators	Vibe Coding & App Generators
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Starts at	$25/mo	$25/mo
Trust score	85 / 100	78 / 100
Platforms	Web	Web
Company	StackBlitz, Inc.	Omniflow
Last verified	Sep 6, 2026	Sep 1, 2026

What our research says

Bolt.new

Bolt is the quickest way to get from a sentence to a running web app you can click, and Bolt Cloud now removes the usual 'where does this deploy' problem for small projects. Treat the token meter as the real price: a complex app burns through the entry allowance fast, and the free tier is for trying the product, not shipping from it.

Pros

Whole toolchain runs in the browser, so there is no environment to set up or keep alive
Starts from a prompt, Figma design, GitHub repo or template, and exports back to GitHub
Bolt Cloud bundles hosting, databases and auth, which most prompt-to-app tools leave to you
Unused Pro tokens roll over, unlike most rivals' monthly allowances

Cons

Token-based pricing is hard to forecast; one long debugging session can eat days of allowance
Free tier is throttled daily (300K tokens) and carries Bolt branding
Yearly discount is advertised without the actual yearly prices on the page
No public API found, so Bolt cannot be driven from a script or CI

Omniflow

Omniflow's angle is keeping the spec, the design preview, and the generated code as one synced artifact instead of three things that drift apart after the first generation — genuinely useful for iterating on a spec rather than one-shotting an app. It outputs real Next.js/TypeScript that can be exported and self-hosted, which matters for anyone who doesn't want to be locked into the platform long-term.

Pros

Keeps PRD, UI preview, and generated code synced as the spec changes
Ships with database, auth, and role-based access already wired in, not just UI
Staging/production environments, SSL, and custom domains included
GitHub sync and full code export avoid platform lock-in

Cons

Output framework is fixed to Next.js/TypeScript
Free tier is limited to a small number of projects before the $25/month plan is needed
Company details (country, team) are not disclosed beyond the product site itself

Which one fits

Choose Bolt.new if you need

Founders and designers who want a clickable prototype or landing page the same afternoon
Developers scaffolding a front end or internal tool before taking it into their own editor
Teams turning a Figma mock into a working front end without hand-coding the first pass

Choose Omniflow if you need

teams that want a PRD, design preview, and code to stay in sync through several iterations
projects that need a provisioned Postgres database and auth wired in from the start
developers who want exportable, ownable code rather than a hosted-only output